AI & Human Oversight

AI may assist with drafting public articles, internal knowledge workflows, and selected report narrative sections.

Assessment scoring and tier gating remain rule-based and versioned — not free-form AI judgement on your legal position.

• Structured prompts, templates, and prohibited-phrase policies.
• Validation checks before content ships to production surfaces.
• Source discipline favouring official UK guidance for factual signposting.
• Safety copy requiring informational framing and limitation statements.

KinClarity is AI-assisted but compliance controlled. Material public content and methodology changes follow a structured review path before publication.

That review checks product accuracy, jurisdiction handling, banned claims, source support, proportionate calls to action, and accessibility — not individual legal merit in your case.

Support teams can escalate report generation failures and policy edge cases for manual investigation.

KinClarity does not represent that a solicitor reviews your individual report unless a future product explicitly states that and implements it.

AI output is not legal advice and may be incomplete. Users must seek qualified legal advice for rights, disputes, and regulated steps.